Safe Schools Inland Empire
FYI
Register here:
They just said they may answer some questions but will not engage in Q & A. Don’t be surprised if your question isn’t answered. Streaming link
Are you going to attend? I am and I have two questions:
Given the fact that the CDC's latest Mask study was rejected by peer review, please present the EXACT, peer reviewed study that you are relying on when invoking mask rules. Likewise, please cite all scientific peer reviewed studies you rely on for guidance, your pages do not cite these. Provide the public links to all.
Please speak to the revocation by the CDC and the FDA of the PCR Emergency Use Authorization , effective December 31, 2021, due to the fact it cannot distinguish between the flu and SARS-Cov2 Please speak to what that means for both the accuracy of testing, and what exact test is used to detect the "Delta Variant".
It is so much more fun to ask questions when you know the answers—especially when you expect to be lied to—dont you think? Continue reading below the flyer.
I covered the PCR tests EAU revocation in my True Report of… so how about I just bounce to the second question, the oh so scary Delta variant. Cool? Cool. Feel free to use the information as your own lines of inquiry.
First of all, there is no “Delta test”. To test for a variant of SARS-CoV-2, samples must undergo gene sequencing, an expensive task. So expensive, that gene sequencing is not available for individual diagnostics. Want to know what variant of the China Virus you have, according to the faulty PCR tests? Sucks to be you. Gene sequencing is done from PCR samples however, according to a Reuters “fact check”
Gene sequencing is so expensive that Riverside County only sequenced 1% of samples in July of 2021, down from 14% in June of 2021.
“But Kenny (from the Tavern),” you say, “84% of the sequencing is the Delta variant and is so much more dangerous and prevalent than the others!”
Actually I have my doubts that any reader is actually thinking that, I know how smart you all are!
We all know those that would say something similar, however. How scary can 84% of 1% be? But wait, there’s more! —Sorry, no more infomercial plagiarism. Seriously though, on the topic of Riverside County, they seem a little confused.
Yes, Riverside County just told the Public that variants can be detected from viral tests. But wai— I mean, to continue. You know what else is scary? The Alpha variant (13,939 cases), which pales in comparison to the Epsilon Variant (28,777 cases).
Look at it another way. These other variants have also had their high points that lasted awhile and then faded away. Take note that earlier I cited that only 1% of samples were tested in July 2021, compared to 14% in June 2021, below we see that while June saw 53% Delta and July was 84%. A little skewed is it not? Why the dramatic decrease in sequencing samples if Delta is so scary. Any mathematicians want to speak to what that means, is it what common sense tells us?
One very important question that I have NOT been able to find. Where are these samples coming from? Could they be collected from those that just crossed our borders (unmasked, unvaccinated, and untested), from God know where on this Earth, during their trek to Red States?
I turned to the US Government Accountability Office to answer that last question, what’s up with the gene sequencing? Are there any inherent dangers? Well, whaddya know.
Not only are there enormous privacy concerns, but there is also a grave danger that non-state actors (with the help of a new “artist”?) could obtain the data to modify pathogens as part of a biological warfare effort.
Are you starting to feel like you’ve seen this movie somewhere before?